Issue 442 Babe Stable News Network?! October 17, 2014

Ok, I am writing this to point something out.  Something so obvious that we have become oblivious to it when we watch the news.  Here we go.

The Babe Anchor:  On every news network you will notice that many of the female news reporters, anchors, and even some commentators typically show their legs.  And in some cases show a little to a lot of cleavage.  But most importantly, the camera men and some of the lighting people try to emphasize this fact on purpose.  Reason is simple, to show these sexy women in the hope to keep audiences watching for a few minutes longer.  Basically it is all about sex selling the news (hi Fox news channel).  But is this a problem.

Morality:  Yes, sex sell, and it sells very well.  But, are we objectifying these women into objects?  The problem is, we are in a sense even if they are complicit in the action.  So morally speaking we have a tentative situation where if we start seeing women wearing even skimpier clothes and making provocative poses on purpose, then we know that we are morally wrong and protest should ensue.  Also, if the women does not want to be highlighted as a sex object, then it should not be forced upon her by her employer, in which again protests should ensue.  However, right now I have heard nothing of the sort happening yet (thank God).  But we must be sure that this does not go any further, and that we all realize the possible consequences of objectifying women.

Conclusion:  Thank you for reading as this can be a potential problem.  Women and men alongside them have fought hard for the idea of equality between the sexes.  However, this objectification can possibly undo that.  Hence the reason I wish to bring it to you (my readers) attention.  So please keep this in mind when running your own businesses, programs, and just in everyday life in general.  No one should be put on the same level as an object, not now or ever.

Issue 441 Death of CD's October 16, 2014

The compact disc (CD) has been a mainstay for the music industry for years.  However, with the ability to download songs from the internet, they have been slowly been phased out.  Allow me to explain the obvious.

Death of multi-song disks:  The main reason is the price of the songs themselves.  Allot of music listeners bought CD's to simply listen to one song over and over again.  But they had to pay the cost for not only that one song, but every song on that CD.  So once you could just buy the songs you like people stopped bothering to buy these multi song discs.  Heck, why would you want to pay for something you do not have too.  So many record companies and bands are looking to simply sell direct to the consumer through the internet.  Here people can preview other songs and buy them if they like.  This helps many small bands and record companies that cannot afford to release all those CD's and thus allows them to cut out yet another middle man in the process of selling their goods (music) to their customers.

Impact:  Soon we will lose the CD player all together just like we did with cassette tapes in the last few years.  Instead, we will have USB cables from our phones, digital music players and thumb drives plug in instead to listen to the songs we want to hear, and only the songs we want to hear.  And even then, they may eliminate the plug in system all together and just have the system link wirelessly to your car radio and radio systems (which is already being done and improved upon).  But if you think about it, this means the elimination of yet another industry.  Yes people will lose jobs, but that is the creative destruction of the market.  In addition, movies will be bought and sold in the same way, which will eliminate the need for DVD and Blue ray players.  Why worry about quality by buying a new system when TV's will have upgradable programing to get more and more detail out of every show that you watch.  Video games too will shift to an all-digital transfer system too, so you can avoid the lines at release and just buy the game online at a much cheaper cost.  Basically, it will work in the same way as when you rent or buy an electronic book from Amazon or Barnes & Noble.  You can buy to keep or buy to rent.  Soon we will see all media entertainment digitized with very few exceptions as we transition away from expensive production lines and embrace a completely internet based economy.  Heck, they may even set up online swap meets for certain content especially when patent rights expire.  This even allows patent rights to be global too (almost forgot that one).

Conclusion:  I personally think books will be the sole exception to total digitization as people still have a nostalgia type feeling when it comes to reading a book.  However, everything else is all about saving money for both the producer and the consumer, with the downloadable content on the internet allowing for the bands themselves to sell their music without the need for a record company.  It allows moviegoers to purchase the movie they just saw the moment they are released in theaters after testing to see if it is worth the $5 or less.  Gamers can get any video game they want from any platform, and play them all on television via their computers.  I can see it now, rather than trying to buy a new game system, the companies will compete on the release of the best controllers to enhance game play (they may even release special televisions for games like they do computers).  Overall, the internet is one of the greatest inventions mankind has ever known, and it is sure to continue changing the way we live and how we buy and sell our wares.

Issue 440 Why vacation is necessary October 15, 2014

Vacation is a wonderful time where you can get away from work and stress.  But many people don't realize why this break is necessary.  Allow me to explain why.

Necessity:  It is one of the most import things you can do for yourself if you work at a stressful job.  You need to relieve that stress as it is very harmful to the body, especially if it is at a constant.  So a vacation gets you out of the stress filled environment and eliminates reminders of the job you do.  Basically it allows you to clear your head.  Also, you have fun on your vacation which means you release other positive chemicals in your body which aid in maintaining overall health.  Essentially you are making yourself feel good on the inside and out.  Sure there are those who have fun at the job itself, but everyone needs that break in order to be healthy.

Conclusion:  I know there is not much to write on this one, but I wanted to emphasize why it is helpful to take a break.  Sure you will eventually have to go back to work, but at least you should be refreshed in doing so.  So stay healthy, and take a vacation.

Issue 439 Paid to quit October 14, 2014

Did you know that some companies are actually willing to pay you to leave?  Yes it is true, and it is happening right now. Let's discuss.

Dead beat workers:  The primary reason this is done is because some of these workers are just dead weight.  So they drag down the company or division they are working in.  So you want these people to leave.  But they need incentives to go so that they can go get another job.

What Amazon does:  Amazon pays $5,000 dollars for their worst people to leave voluntarily.  Yes that is right, if you really stink at your job at Amazon.com they will pay you to leave.  Rather than being forced to fire you, they rather you leave voluntarily and thus without incident.

Advantages:  For one, this is very moral.  Rather than leave these people high and dry after being fired, they will have $5,000 to play with while they seek out new employment.  Also, Amazon pays for peoples college, so this way a worker can leave after they get their degree and have money to help pay back debts (if any) and seek out a job that suits their degree.  There is also a pension advantage.  These workers while they work contribute to the overall pension fund.  However, since they leave, they no longer have claim to the money they put in, and thus it acts as a way to sure up the pension fund for workers who plan to work in the business until retirement.  Also, as they leave voluntarily, it removes the chance for potential lawsuits which helps protect the companies from possible financial harm.  However, this is mostly feasible for temp workers in tech companies.  This helps prevent unionization (or even the need to) and is generally beneficial in fulfillment centers like at Amazon.  Following the same policy in the areas that require raw talent like computer programing, it becomes less of an advantage because it can harm the business for they will lose talent that can bring their company to newer and greater heights.  So the areas where skill/talent are not required will work best.

Conclusion:  The overall advantages are clear.  The less talented can get a college education, or have money to hold them over while they seek out a job.  Almost eliminates the need to worry about lawsuits.  And it removes the dead weight in the business which opens up the area for more talented and harder working individuals. So I say that this is way better than outright firing someone. Less guilt for getting rid of bad workers is a really good thing.

Issue 438 Weed (the non smokable kind) October 13, 2014

Weed is the slang term of the plant Marijuana.  It can be used as an intoxicant, but it can also be used in other ways as well.  So let us review the non-smoke able forms of weed.

Medicine:  For one, marijuana is an effective painkiller that can be superior to things like Percocet’s and the like.  But it does not need to be smoked for it to be used.  It can be ingested in the form of a lollipop, a cookie, pasta, breads and more with the right preparation.  As such, you can prevent your lungs from being ruined by smoking the weed.  Also, as it is ingested, it is more potent.  As such, less of it is required to be used to get the same result as smoking it.  This makes it an efficient medicine.

Paper: Part of the original reason weed was banned was because it competed with the lumber industry.  In this case the production of paper.  In some cases weed is still used to make paper, but not on a large scale due to it still being illegal on the Federal level of government.  But if fully legalized it can completely supplant the lumber industries paper production.  This may mean less trees being felled just to create paper products.  This also may mean we will be wiping our rears with paper made from weed.  (You are allowed to laugh at this, because it is true).

Hemp:  In addition to making ropes from weed, we can make fabrics.  So we can have bed sheets, pillows and even clothing made from marijuana plants (bamboo can be used in the same way).  Their fibers can be used in a number of ways.

Building materials:  This plant can be used to even make furniture by compressing it into hard wood like materials.  So you can make chairs, veneers and other materials.  It can even be used to make plastics, oils and glues.

Conclusion:  Marijuana as a plant is flexible in its uses and thus can become a major component to America's economy.  The only thing left now is for the federal government to get out of the way so weed can start helping the country in ways other than smoking it.

Issue 437 Advantages of Hydroponics October 10, 2014

Hydroponics is a form of advanced farming that requires human input for plants to grow in an artificial environment.  Developed during the space age for interstellar travel, it is becoming more and more useful to us as a way of decreasing the overall waste of land resources with respect to certain forms of farming.  Let's discuss what this form of farming does better than the regular variety.

Advantages:  

1)  Needs no pesticides or diseases:  In this enclosed environment there is no bugs that could eat the plants which means no need for chemicals that could harm the plants or us the people who will eat them.  Hence there is also no need to fear diseases that would kill plants as they are isolated from the outside world.

2) Controlled sunlight:  Each plant grows better at different times of the day and with different light spectrums.  As such, each one can be varied per plant type to enhance growth.  In addition, using lights that do not produce heat like LED's means that plants can be grown closer together, but using light intensity can cause the plant being grown to become softer or crisper as it grows.

3) Cutting out the pollinators: Here we do not need bees or other animals to pollinate plants as robots and people do the job.  This thus eliminates the possibility of these plants not reaching maturity.

4) Year round growth:  Plants in a hydroponics garden can have year round growth.  So no worries about particular seasons to grow food in or even the weather outside.  Temperature controls keep plants in optimal growing conditions.

5) Nutrient rich water/soil:  Unlike traditional farming outside where water and nutrients for plants can be wasted, here it all can be monitored and reused.  So the water will be pumped in with a robot measuring the nutrients needed for each plant to grow.  Then the robot can add additional nutrients to accommodate the plants needs for growth without human input. Extra water can then be sent back to the beginning from where it was pumped in and then reused again and again.

6) Larger crop yields:  Hydroponics are only limited by the size of the facility.  With this form of farming more crops can be grown to feed growing populations all year round with maximum efficiency.  This eliminates the need to transport them as goods from the countryside to the city.  Thus it saves costs on a large scale as farmers main costs become their electric bills.  This also improves the working conditions for farmers and their workers as these crops can be harvested rain or shine and have the major grunt work handled by robots if more back breaking work is required.  

Disadvantages:  I only know of one key disadvantage (not counting the fact that even plants need to sleep for a specified period of time) and that is humanity.  In the case of this form of farming, we may cause these plants to evolve into plant species that are dependent on humanity to survive and only in these types of facilities.  For instance, if you look at the origin of corn, it was small and bite sized.  Through man’s intervention and selective breeding, we created the corn we know and love to eat today.  So this manipulation can backfire and hence, if we become too reliant on technology to grow our food, we may suffer if the power goes out for an extended period of time.

Conclusion:  This form of farming is excellent at providing food for a city and other large urban populations as they can grow food right in the middle of all the hustle and bustle of a city.  Probably the only main disadvantage is that not all plants can grow in a hydroponics garden like corn and certain grains (let alone fruit grown on trees).  This leaves them to the rural farms to provide, but I have no doubt that hydroponics gardening could eventually figure out a solution and all our food can grow in them.  Thus, food crises may become a thing of the past.  One can only hope.

Issue 436 Paying for Political Primaries October 9, 2014

Political primaries are essentially votes to see who is going to run in an election while representing a particular political group.  Hence we have a Republican primary, a Democratic primary, and even a primary for independents and other groups who wish to see their candidates run for a selected office.  But why the heck are these primaries paid for with taxpayer dollars?

Corruption:  The reason these primaries are paid for by our hard earned taxpayer dollars is because of the corrupt nature of the American electoral system (democracy).  This is because those in charge (Democrats and Republicans) can shift money while their members hold office to secure their hold on American politics.  Thus it makes it impossible for another group to hold a political primary unless they can fund it themselves or manipulate the major parties from within, while these main political primaries control all the monitorial resources. So what should be done?

The solution:  As I see it, primaries are by very nature an election amongst members of a club who seek a representative to represent their interests in something else.  In this case a political office.  Hence, while the actual election to fill a political office should be paid for, the primary which selects the candidates should not.  Therefore each the governments in the United States should cut funding toward the political parties.  Remember, the parties themselves are more of a club than anything where people of similar interests gather and talk about politics.  They have more than enough money to run their own primaries without the aid of any government.

Making it cheap:  Before I did say that most of these parties required financial support save the big parties, which is way the two major parties will be unaffected financially save them paying for their own political primaries.  However, the smaller groups involved in politics still need to choose members to run for particular offices.  Thus, why do they not simply give each of their members a number and have them vote online.  There is no need for a brick and mortar voting box for a political primary in the first place as it is a vote amongst members of a club. This ensures that it is cheap and members can be tracked to see how many voted in each area of the country (depending on the office that is to be filled) to identify active and inactive members.  It ensures transparency as well and costs not a single penny with respect to taxpayers.  Heck, it is no longer limited to a single day either which helps insure that everyone within the political party has a chance to vote.  So why not do it this way?

Conclusion:  I have sat as a member of the board of elections time and time again for a political primary.  As such I have seen firsthand the number of people voting in primaries is not worth the thousands and sometimes millions spent to hold them by government.  Primary elections are not even part of the United States Constitution.  At my voting station alone last primary, I had three people of 16 vote in the conservative primary, 14 of 56 vote in the Democratic primary, and 1 out of 3 in the Conservative primary.  I even heard that in some voting areas, they had one single person.  Meanwhile, I was one of six people paid $180 (or more) to sit on my rear end for 16 hours and literally do nothing at all.  Kind of dumb is it not.  A total waste of everyone’s time.  So can we stop this club nonsense and stop wasting taxpayer dollars on a club activity.