Issue 303 Devalued life March 31, 2014

Can we all agree that life is a precious thing? I thought we all could, but it seems even in the modern era (can we call ourselves that) that life is as cheap as it always has been. Here are my reasons why.

Life is cheap: Did you know that in Belgium you can kill a mentally disabled child under a certain age? There reasoning is that you are doing the child a favor by ending their "suffering" early. How about the way we treated Edward Snowden as he was forced to run to countries that would normally be considered advisories to protect him from the United States government. In North Korea, the current leader is killing members of his own family because they made slights against him. The Middle East and Africa have entire villages being wiped out in wars of ethnic, racial and religious genocide. How about Ukraine, which was almost in civil war as the Prime Minister before fleeing tried to suppress his people by using the police? By suppress, I mean shooting them and beating them to death. And you know what? Something similar is happening in Venezuela right now as well. These are just some small examples of the carnage that we are bringing upon our fellow human beings.

I am disturbed: I fear for the people of this world. Why is it that we seek to self cull our own species in our lust for power or our fatal compassion? We kill the unborn, and some even wish to kill the born under a certain age out of compassion of the mother or the hard life we think these children may lead. The killing in other countries is just nonsensical. People in power really are desperate enough to end another's life to keep their position. Or how about the more common method of destroying a persons reputation through various propaganda to ruin the opposition (a life ruined may also equal a life taken as well). Arrogance, fear and compassion seem to be the driving force behind these atrocious actions. But how can they be stopped?

Conclusion: I really hate to say it, but the way to stop these acts of tyranny is through education and fear. For education, we must face our history and learn every reason why wars, gang violence and other forms of fighting, killing and discrimination take place. We must understand that stereotypes were originally used to disenfranchise select groups of people with ways to make such words and rumors powerless. It is a must that our future generations understand how to use logic and discussion first and foremost in the fight against the tyranny of their fellow man. The other half is fear and it must come in the form of a deterrent. People armed with the knowledge of how and when to fight are a threat to keep both government and criminals at bay. I say this from the unique perspective of being an American citizen who grew up around people who where in law enforcement, military and recreational shooters. In short I grew up around the gun and learned proper fear and respect for it. Armed societies do not fear their governments. Armed societies fear no other man. We were created equal, but the gun keeps us that way, for it is power over yourself and others. Don't like guns, then how about a hatchet, a kitchen knife, a bully club, or just your bare knuckles. You must defend yourself and others from the evils of this world for we have lost the respect for life itself. These are my thoughts on this matter and I hope you find a better answer than mine.

Issue 302 Surrogates March 28, 2014

What is a surrogate? What does it do? and What does it have to do with you? Well, let me tell you.

A surrogate: In the case I am talking about, I am talking about machines (again). In this case the machine is a surrogate for us. In short we will have machine partners that will act in a similar fashion to R2-D2 and C-3PO from Star Wars. In the case of our society, the robots or personal computers (persicom sound like a good name?) will have a way of interacting with us on an intelligent basis. They will be able to take any command and based on capability perform that command to the letter. As people are becoming more spontaneous and need more flexibility, the personal computer or robot assistant will have to act as a secretary, librarian, archivist, researcher, and stenographer all wrapped into one, and maybe even then some. Basically, people are good at being spontaneous, while computers have fantastic memory. As such, using these surrogates to amplify our abilities like memory and information recall skills makes it all that much easier for people to conduct their daily lives.

More complex surrogates may aid the disabled and seniors who cannot leave their homes, by actually going to work in their stead or even go shopping for them. This can be an automated process, or even done via remote. Some surrogates may come in the form of simple exoskeletons enabling the bedridden to walk out the house and back into to the sunlight.

Evolution of the Surrogate: In my opinion, the surrogates evolved from when we decided to replace people with machines in all the dull, dirty and dangerous jobs that required zero ingenuity and trouble shooting skills. From there we wanted smarter more capable machines that could do that semi, dull, dirty and dangerous tasks. Now we want to have them as our personal assistants to help us in our daily tasks by voice command (or maybe even mental signal) alone. Thus, we have slowly reduced the need for people to work in various rolls and ways of being. So we have allowed these surrogates to replace us in all those boring (based on opinion) jobs. But are we trying to have them replace us? Do we already not have a problem with the fact that most people in the United States are not more than five feet away from their personal electronic devices like a smart phone?

Conclusion: Yet another ethical situation we have here. Do we need more of these surrogate machines to do these jobs? Is there a need for a personal computer type robot device like R2-D2 and C-3PO (though that would be very cool)? My answer is be wary of it, but also it should be your personal opinion on whether you buy such a device. It will be you to decide if these machines will be needed and useful in your every day life. The reason is because you will have to buy it. Enjoy thinking what life would be like with your own personal computerized assistant.

 

Issue 301 Terror of tech!!! March27, 2013

Have you though maybe technology s moving a little too fast? I did not think so at first, but after some shows featuring staff from Google and other tech and economics gurus, I began to worry. So here is why.

Can't keep pace: Technology is growing by leaps and bounds. Machines do our laundry, our dishes, and even wake us up in the morning (no need for mom or a butler). Soon, technology will be driving us to work in completely automated vehicles. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York City has discussed having their trains be completely automated with a single staff member to trouble shoot for problems. However, currently 2 people are on staff at any given time on the subways. So this means people will loose their job. Once the technology is deemed acceptable and safe, that other staff member may be replaced as well, leaving the train with no human personnel to drive or monitor it from on board. Similar discussions have taken place with respect to flying plains and even to the concept of the flying car. Would you let a plain fly you from Japan to California without a pilot? Well with technology, this is in fact feasible.

Let's look at medicine. A sonogram machine has been reduced in size to that of a smart phone for the smaller cost of $2,500 on the cheapest (regular machines can cost well over $30,000). Heart monitors along with other brain and life reading devices has also been shrunk and automated leaving doctors to interpret the readings themselves without any need to have the patient see a specialist (cheaper for the patient obviously). Another device in the works is a litmus testing device to diagnose diseases on the spot eliminating the need to see a doctor for diagnosis of various pathogens.

Then we have basic retail. There really is no need for a cashier when you have radio frequency identification (RFID) technology. It works like a barcode, but sends out short wave transmissions instead once hit by an electronic signal. These RFID chips identify the item you are buying without it ever having to leave your shopping cart. So in the future you may see a device that looks similar to a small metal detector that will scan all your items instantly and then all you have to do is pay a robot at checkout once you have finalized your cart. Oh, and don't bother looking for people on the floor restocking shelves. This too will be done by robots as they already have specialized machines doing this job in where houses with it only being a matter of time and money before you see it in our own home towns.

The terror: With the aforementioned examples, you can see allot of basic jobs and high level jobs becoming outmoded, or reduced in function. This affects us all as we will be forced to find more higher level technology jobs in order to just make a living. It has been estimated by some executives at Google that by 2030, if the pace does not slow down, over 60% of the jobs in the United States alone will be lost to technology.

Conclusion: Do not get me wrong, technology is a good thing. However, we have to check how fast we let ourselves be consumed by it. If we do not look into how to adapt to the changing business and job environment, we may face imminent peril. Sure, newer and higher paying jobs will result which will balance out the job losses for future generations; however our concern must lay with those in the immediate term. Those people who will loose their jobs to a cold heartless machine will need to be retrained to work in new fields or work at other jobs which may make light of their skills and accomplishments. So I ask you all to think and be prepared for possible upheavals in the job market and even maybe think of ways to slow it down so that people will not have to suffer.

Issue 300 Ghost in the Shell?! March 26, 2014

 
We are ghosts inhabiting a shell made of flesh, but what of the internet and the desktop computer as another type of shell. The Internet itself is a shell with massive amounts of data which interact at any given time and that in the shell of cyberspace, an intelligent life form can form. Kind of hard to describe in a few words, so let's discuss to make it a little easier.

Concept: The Internet is filled with data. I addition, the Internet has viruses, programs and other applications happening all at once. Some of that data even gets lost. On top of this, some of these programs and viruses are designed to either collect data or to mimic other programs. As artificial intelligence programs also get lost on the Internet, they too get mixed in this soup of data. From this point some scientists believe life from this lost data collecting together can spontaneously erupt.

Questions: If you are asking yourself "why is he bringing this topic to his blog?" then I will tell you there is a reason. The first reason is that it is an interesting concept and the idea that life can form spontaneously like this is just fascinating. Another, but more important reason is because we all will be interacting with computers on a more personal basis in the future. They already have systems to read brainwaves which are used to move objects like wheelchairs for the disabled with more applications to come. Some scientists are trying to hook up their brains to the Internet so as to explore other possibilities of the man and machine interface. With that said, this brings us to yesterdays issue on down loadable soldiers. Can a human mind survive cyberspace and come out the same person? And can life actually form on the internet without help?

Of the mind and cyberspace: I believe that the human mind is still too complex for a computer to understand. While programs can mimic human learning and some basic emotions, they cannot feel the way we do. As such, if we were to dump our brains into a computer, it is my personal belief we will loose emotion. In short, we will become as cold as the machine itself due to our brains being too complex to copy. On top of this, it is my feeling that the human mind will loose all sense of self if exposed to something as vast as the Internet. All that data is now also interacting with yourself and being shared. In short, a passing cyber virus or program may just rip a part of your mind off and move on, leaving you with gaps in both memory and maybe even physically damaged and disabled.

Let us also not forget about hackers. Another worry is if the mind somehow survives the riggers of cyberspace, will it survive a cyber attack. Imagine the president of the United States has his mind cyberized that allows him/her to access the net with a thought. Then you remember the interaction goes both ways where even the president can be hacked into and maybe even taken over. That is one of the most serious "forms" of cyber attack on cyberized humans, with others being surveillance or just copying memories of both personal or even financial data. Scary is it not?

With the aforementioned said, data colleting together will not form an intelligent life form. Sure there are programs designed to eat lost bits of data, but that data must be useful in some way to bring forth life. So unless it can learn like a human can then it will not work. Yes they do have learning robots with a certain level of intelligence, but intelligent life is not just knowledge alone. It is also emotion which can only be mimicked by commuters. As such, even if the data collects into something that can interact in some way with humans, it cannot surpass humans with respect to the fact that it has no emotion. Therefore, it cannot be considered truly alive.

Conclusion: I personally think the Internet is much too vast to actually create life on its own. However, I do think with people starting to think they can interact with it beyond the physical level; the risks of our ghost in our fleshy shells are put at risk of loosing ourselves. More and more we must think upon the ethics and implications of technology and its dangers in addition to its benefits. While the ideas of life on the net (ours or artificial) is intriguing, it does not mean it should be attempted without proper precautions and measured risk.

Issue 299 Downloadable soldier March 25, 2014

This is frightening and astounding. The men who own Google have written that in the future it may be possible to download a soldier the moment he/she dies in battle to a computer and then later place them in a new body. Let's discuss.

The concept: Like I stated in my introduction, the idea that a person who dies can be downloaded into a computer is a bit far fetched with current technology. But, is it a feasible concept? The advantages are that the overall experiences of that soldier can be preserved rather than loosing a valuable resource or even having to train a brand new soldier. On top of this it may be possible to download anyone who dies and give them a new body, thus eliminating deaths on the battlefield and at home. Intriguing is it not?

Other possibilities from this: This may also allow people to experience other people’s lives on a very personal level. You can share memories of your choosing (or steal them for that matter) to anyone you like. No more need for schools as math and science can be downloaded to the child in a matter of seconds. Weird, but it is feasible in the future envisioned by the members of the Google team.

Fear: I have questions. For one, can this technology really benefit us? I mean, if we download a soldier who has just died will they still be themselves? In short, can a soul be transferred from a body, to a computer and into a new body? Will it still be a human being or some expendable machine that serves to fill in a flashy robot with the experiences to fight and die over and over for our country? Even the idea of possibly sharing memories with each other in this way is dangerous as how would it affect the person receiving those memories. Would that person still be the individual you know? These are questions that must be answered and may even lead to more.

Conclusion: Why do I bring this to your attention? Simple, because this has to be discussed. The technology if left unchecked is very scary in its potential for things to go wrong. Can we treat the soul as just a bunch of memories? What is the soul and how can it interact with modern and future technology? Are there social consequences or other repercussions to be had? It comes down to ethics and ensuring that while capable of doing something, that we know the potential consequences and whether or not it should be done. So enjoy the discussion of what is to come for it is more important than you may think.

Issue 298 Why invest in technology March 24, 2014

Ladies and Gentlemen, technology is taking over. It is only a matter of time before the rise of the machine takes away many jobs of the past. But why?

The cause: Government has been one of the main culprits of causing the decline of the traditional worker. Mandates of health care, taxation in many forms and regulations have all compounded to make hiring new workers very difficult for businesses to do. As such, businesses reacted by reducing personnel hours and even investing in alternate methods of serving people that do not require people.

Then there is the tech industry. Ever looking toward the future, these inventors, tech moguls and more look to improve life by making either more convenient, solving key niche problems or just trying to be innovative in the market place. Thus, tech companies are driving the other half of the push toward a technology oriented and high skilled job future.

Reactions: Due to the government interference with regulations and other burdens, companies have been exchanging people with self checkout machines. Others have replaced workers in the dull, dirty and dangerous jobs with automation and robots. This is why you see robots mining in some places, robots welding car parts together and a single operator able to control an entire factory floor from the safety of a clean noise free office. This is only going to expand as now companies are looking at robots that assist people in their daily lives as a form of assistant. Some have been envisioned as aiding workers in lifting crates and depositing them where needed, helping assist in the operating rooms or acting as repositories of information so that the human can focus on the intuitive aspects of the task over the mundane parts. What the future holds is not stopping as even taxis and later commercial motor vehicles begin to be automated. It is a hard future to see, but it is clear, mankind is getting a future where they interact more with a machine rather than another human.

Conclusion: Based on these pieces of information I have acquired from the news (Economist, Blaze, NY Times, Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, Science Channel, etc) it is important to invest in technology. By doing so you can get rich on this growing and very broad field of business that is sure to change the way we live and how we look at the world.

Issue 297 Electoral reform March 21, 2014

Elections are essential for a Republic like the United States. They determine our Representatives and thus determine the direction the nation is headed. But there is corruption involved which secures the two main political parties as power brokers and thus limits alternative candidates. Rather than focus on the corruption here, I would like to discuss an alternative to the current rules so that anyone can run for office without the political manipulations.

The idea: The idea is simple; create an account for each individual running for office. Yea, it is not necessarily that simple. These accounts belong to each candidate and are monitored by a body that ensures that the money comes from U.S. citizens or businesses. These accounts are given to each person running for office so that all individuals who have decided to run for office have a centralized fund that can be monitored by the public to detect unlawful use and spot for other forms of corruption. So under this system, no individual is left out of running for office unlike the current system where you have to achieve a certain popularity rating.

How it works: A similar idea is to create an account that is shared equally between both candidates to use does not sit well with me. It does not take into account that individuals giving money to a candidate is a form of the freedom of speech. So having individual accounts makes sense. Also, currently, individuals are limited to how much they can donate to a campaign (even though the loopholes favor the two main political parties). As such, that limitation would be eradicated so that people would be able to donate as much as they please (including businesses) to their candidate with one stipulation. That stipulation is that all donations are anonymous. This prevents the candidates from knowing who actually donated to their campaign which prevents future kick backs to an extent. It also prevents political backlash by the other candidates who may win and want to punish those who did not support them. So this is how it works.

Conclusion: This idea is not 100% perfect, that I know. But I also know it is at least better than our current election rules that thrive on corruption and solidify the Democrat and Republican power base. As such, I submit this idea which protects your privacy and freedom of speech to you my dear readers. Critique it as you may, I am open to all improvements.