Part 2 of the radical leftist segment is on the radical
environmentalists. Here we look into what these people want to happen to
accommodate their cause.
Population Control: Like yesterday, many of these
radical leftists believe in the same overpopulation problem as their
counterparts. Some in this category are willing to go just as far to
reduce the human population and its "detrimental" impact on the
environment.
Animals before People: Here people are not as important as
the animals existing in this world. So if a farmer who has been farming
for generations on land he/she owns happens to share that land with an
endangered species, the radicals will attempt to force the farmer off the land
(some through legalities, and others through force). This also includes
anything that would disrupt their perceived notions of the "perfect"
untouched environment. So if a rail road that would be built, a factory
or anything that would provide jobs, and bring the costs of goods down, the
environmentalists would reject it if it goes through untouched lands.
They would prefer ejecting people from their homes than harming nature.
So much so that some of their supporters in government are pushing for
laws that would allow people to sue on behalf of rocks, trees and of course the
animals themselves.
Fuels: Well, environmentalists where opposed to oil so they
went to natural gas as an alternative. Then when they did not like that
they switched to ethanol, and then strictly to solar and wind. Basically,
so long as it protects the environment from emissions then they are for it
(unless it is nuclear which they fear due to radiation and disposal of waste
material). However, while they favor these emission free methods of power
generation, they refuse to accept temporary alternatives like natural gas to
help transition over to them over time. They want immediate results which
does not work.
Global warming: They believe wholeheartedly in the
global warming agenda and that people caused it. So much so that some
have openly advocated arresting people who disagree with them (some even more
radical than them have called for murder). They have blamed decreases in
populations of animals like the polar bear, turtles having more sex and animal
over population, people being depressed and more all on global warming.
At this point anything can be blamed on global warming and they may just
believe it.
Goals: Their agenda is to create a perfect society that has
no environmental impact at all. As such, some are trying to force vegan-ism
(eating only plants and no meat) on the population by having legislatures tax
the methane that cows fart (yes I am being serious). They do this because
it increases meat prices causing vegetables to be the more affordable option.
In addition they advocate urban farming (something I am not opposed to),
but they want this so they can move the entire population into mega cities so
that all rural farm land can be given back to nature. As such they wish
to do away with cars, and embrace more public transportation and other forms of
mass transit. Anything that would mean people living in the city and
nature having all the rest of the planet is something they will always be in
favor of.
Conclusion: Like the previous, this does not
list all of what this portion of the radicals believe in. Also, it does
not categorize all who believe in global warming as a radical (some are quite
nice and do not want to use force or any silliness at all). But, there
are those who are so radical that they overshadow the good people who just want
a cleaner and better environment for the next generation.
No comments:
Post a Comment