Thursday, May 29, 2014

Issue 346 Can the military fight without electronics May 29, 2014

   
Based on my limited knowledge, the military has become highly dependent on electronic devices to carry out its operations.  Global positioning systems require satellites and the ability to interpret the data via computer. Aircraft need computers to fly as their designs are purposefully made aerodynamically unstable.  Ground troops rely on computers to help aim and fire their guns.  So what can the military do to save themselves from something like an electromagnetic pulse (EMP)?

Faraday cages:  A Faraday cage is a metal cage that acts as a shield for electronic equipment.  It essentially uses a metal box, metal mesh, or layers of each to block electromagnetic radiation from reaching the object inside.  Essentially, this is a form of shielding from EMP, and other similar waves that may disrupt or destroy electronic equipment.  Certain military facilities are sure to have and use this technology already, but is enough of their facilities equipped with this shielding to protect the equipment inside?  Basically, can we take a tank and encase its most sensitive components in a Faraday cage to protect it so that in the event of a nuclear blast that it can still turn on and function.  All this is possible so as to protect all combat equipment in the Army, Navy, Air-force and Marines (and the rest of the defense industry and power grid as well).   The military needs this high tech equipment to coordinate tactics and strategy along with coordinate logistics.  Without this tech, our military and the defense infrastructure of the United States would be brought back to the 1800's.  In short, without such protection, the U.S. would be helpless.

Alternative GPS/communications Satellites:  One other essential system that is required by our military to function is GPS and other satellites.  Without these, our precision munitions, location tracking and communications would be limited.  Yes, I said we can protect them with a Faraday cage, but the other military's of the world are also looking into missiles that strike these communication and guidance systems to remove them by shooting them down and the capabilities of the United States to defend itself along with it.  So there are two options.  One is to create man portable communication towers and aircraft that can hoover above the battlefield providing these very same capabilities, while at the same time networking via internet with other systems and surviving ones.  The other is to try and use stealth technology.  For option one, you can have a series of small blimps/aircraft that can stay aloft for days at a time to provide all the observation, recon photos you want along with GPS and communications ability.  Towers equipped to command vehicles will receive date to transmit it to forces, or said forces will have their own methods of communicating with these flying systems.  The other option which uses stealth technologies will invest in creating satellites invisible to enemy sensors, or have a defense system to either overload the incoming missiles guidance system, or shoot it down entirely.  These are the main options here.

Passive:  The final piece that will help the military to protect itself is to use passive sensor and communications technology.  Here, in order to detect and target the enemy, the military uses a system to locate the source of the enemy's radar, or communications equipment.  By finding the source the military can target the enemy nearly undetected. In addition, they can use other satellites and communications equipment owned by other countries by hacking in and using it to replace lost systems.  This will force the enemy to even destroy their own satellites or face them being turned against them.  In this way, the military can adapt to their situation.

Conclusion:  While these solutions present real possibilities, they will not solve the overall problem.  As such, the military will still need to train in augmented training scenarios to communicate and fight without certain equipment being available to them.  As such, being able to fight primitively has its advantages. So as long our military learns to adapt, and takes steps to protect itself, it can continue protecting us. 

No comments:

Post a Comment