War theft is the act of stealing during a time of war. We
know this to be a wrongful act, but some consider it justice for the trouble of
being forced to fight in the first place. Let's discuss.
Against: Those who see theft of a person’s property during
war see it from the traditional standpoint of stealing. There is no
justification for stooping down to the level of a criminal. Usually
though, this form of theft is committed by soldiers in the field who see no
reason to let go of a battle souvenir. Others see it as a way to get rich
off of rare and valuable items. But again that is still thievery and has
no justification and is highly dishonorable. In the same fashion as the
Nazi's, a soldier stealing from civilians in war time is just as wrong as what
the Nazi's did in stealing from the Jews.
For: In this case there are those who do favor it as a
means to pay for the war. In this case, soldiers who are paid low wages
to fight are allowed to take items they deem valuable to make up for the costs
to them and their families. In short, they may even act like treasure
hunters or even pirates, taking the valuables of people whose homes have been
abandoned due to the fighting. This may even include valuable works in
history like art pieces and rare historical specimens, which the soldiers can
either keep or sell to give themselves a monetary boost. Let's face it,
soldiers are paid meager wages and deserve better to make up the money they
should be making.
Pragmatic: Instead of just letting soldiers
just take goods home with them, there can be battlefield salvage rules.
If there are items that are left abandoned in a home after a battle,
soldiers can lay claim. However, they will only be allowed to keep them
if no one comes to claim the items after one year. In this instance, a
special note will be left behind for the original occupants to aid them in
finding their lost wears. In the meantime, items claimed by soldiers will
be held at a holding facility in country until the time limit comes up or the
items are claimed. This also protects items from being stolen by other
individuals or soldiers we are fighting to fund their own war efforts.
Conclusion: The only two that come remotely
close to being moral are those "against" and the
"pragmatic" views. War theft that is unregulated can lead to
many problems, not least including law suits. However, I am personally
against this form of war theft, as it is immoral to me on the societal and
religious level. Taking what is not yours is a crime and thus I am
against it.
No comments:
Post a Comment