We have all heard the quote “The
foundation of every State is the education of its youth.” Well duh, a dumb nation cannot progress. A dumb nation means we cannot compete intellectually
with other nations because jobs are created by smart people who invest their
income wisely. International businesses
not only look at how cheep it is for it to establish itself and produce its
products, but also the education of workers because smart labor equals skilled
labor equals profits. We are in a race
for the most highly skilled workers on the planet, an education arms race if
you will. Problem, our education system
has some major malfunctions inhibiting our, your, Americas future, from getting the
best quality education.
The first problem is when school
elections are held: Have you noticed
that school elections are not held on the same day as a general election, the
very same general election where we as citizens cast our vote for our President,
and federal, State and local representatives?
The reason is because the school boards want a lower voter turnout. Some are thinking why the heck would they
want a lower turnout? Simple, with less
people voting, officials are more likely to be elected or re-elected. Budgets are almost guaranteed to pass even if
that budget is flawed, or clearly does nothing to enhance the education of the
students and line the pockets of the education bureaucracy. In other words, the members of the education
bureaucracy only have to be responsible to the segment of the community who
actually gets out and votes and not the entire community.
Next is the problem with the
Lemons: No, not the fruit or the cars, I
mean bad teachers. Usually, these bad
teachers can’t be fired due to tenure or contract, so schools have an
alternative solution. They trade off bad
teachers with other schools hoping the newer one was better than the last. This of course means that the new teacher can
be as bad as or worse than the one traded away.
Other teachers go into what the people of New York State
call rubber rooms. This is where bad
teachers go while they wait for there hearings to take place, all the while
getting paid to do nothing. Some might
say remove tenure, which is something I am in favor of, but here I will discuss
alternatives. In the case of the rubber
rooms, a teacher who is not in the classroom teaching should not be paid. That’s right, if your not working you should
not be paid and the fear of being placed into one of these rubber rooms will
put the fear of God into that select minority of bad teachers. This also eliminates the need to trade off
bad teachers because they can simply threaten to send poor performing teachers,
and those who commit worse acts than failing their students, into a rubber
room. Thus, the number of bad teachers
should drop.
Another Approach: An alternative that can be
combined with the first is to make tenure renewable. In other words it will expire after a certain
period of time and teachers’ records will be used to justify its renewal. This is a very simple solution, because their
application for renewal may be denied and that bad teacher will then be let
go. I suggest every five to eight years
for a renewal of tenure. I chose these
numbers because it’s long enough to evaluate a teachers performance under
“safe” circumstances and at the same time give the teacher the ability to enjoy
the original intention of tenure, the freedom to discuss points of view in the
classroom.
But, what happens to the bad
teachers who do manage to be fired. Why
they can simply get another teaching job.
Your saying how does that work aren’t you? Well, it’s because unlike the majority of
professions, teacher’s records are sealed.
The new employer can’t look into the reason why the teacher no longer
has their original teaching job, or even the fact that they were fired. So why is it that a teacher has their records
sealed and not other professions? Why
inhibit employers in schools from insuring that America ’s children are getting the
best of the best?
This leads me to another
question: Why are we only giving special
attention to the best students? This is
due to the track system which was developed during the industrialization of America . The original intent was to give the top
performers in schools the most attention because they were perceived as the
next generation of politicians and lawyers.
The next group was expected to be accountants, and secretaries who aid
the top group while the final group (the majority) was to be factory workers
and farmers. This system has always
worked by giving attention to students based on performance. However, performance is based on test scores that
are factored in with other factors which inflate grades like behavior. So good students academically are given less
attention because of poor behavior such as obedience or the number of times
they raise their hand while others are given higher grades because they might
behave better than the rest of the class.
This is not fair and nor is it equal treatment. This is biased education from a bygone
era. The track system must end for all
students who must all be held to the same standards. They must be given the exact attention they
need to succeed and above all treated like the next Albert Einstein.
We are still left with inflated
grades based on behavior though. So make
academic performance and behavior two separate grades. Academic performance and behavior do not
correlate which is why grades get inflated or even deflated, so there is no
reason to not make this change for teachers are already accounting for a
student’s behavior. This will make
grading fair and equitable and allow both parents and teachers to identify what
areas a student is week in whether it is academically, respecting others, group
work, attention to detail, all of which is important in the working world
No comments:
Post a Comment