Ok I waited several days to digest the debate because I was not
confident on what I saw last Thursday. But now I am ready to give my
reaction. That reaction is as follows.
For one, Trump not being there was a
blessing. Donald Trump being who he is, is a total disruption and
distracts from everything policy wise due to his rambunctious bomb throwing
personality. As such, we got a real debate on policy issues and what the
other candidates would do if they became President. Most of the talk
focused on ISIS when it came to national defense, with the other topic being
addressed being and tax reform. However Rand Paul being back on stage was
something of a canary in the coal mine. Many of the pundits agree with
me, or maybe I should say I agree with them, that Rand provided constitutional
context to any policy as he was the go to on stage for constitutional
questions. As such he acted as a bomb thrower saying "ok, you can do
this, but not that due to the Constitution" or his applying the economic
and social freedom arguments to his answers which forced the other candidates
to respond in ways that they did not appear to be prepared for.
As to the candidates individually, while I
do not agree that he will make a good President with respect to my own
differences in politics, Chris Christie, I believe, with his passion and vigor
would make him a great choice as attorney general (he is a former prosecutor as
I understand). Jeb Bush as usual was soft spoken, but whether it be him,
or his advisors, he was more passionate and pushed his way into the limelight
giving a good showing. So it was his best performance yet even if it was
not enough to win the nomination. Kasich I really did not hear anything
of substance and seemed to be ignored most of the debate. Ben Carson
spoke up and had a few zingers, but sadly he will not be nominated as the
Republican base (or should I say leadership does not think he can win if pitted
against Hillary. Rubio and Cruz had a great tit for tat on their records
and Rand Paul served as the individual to confirm if what they were saying
about each other was true or not (they are all after all Senators who work
together regularly). At the end, Rubio and Cruz tied it up in that debate
as Rubio made himself look more electable, and Cruz successfully fending off
most attacks save on the issue of immigration reform where he looked as if he
was caught up in a lie or an act on the issue of amnesty something his voting
record clearly shows he is not in favor of.
Post-debate interviews were great as they
allowed candidates to clarify their answers from the debate and more time to
speak their piece. Most of these interviews after the debate though
focused on parrying the attacks made on the candidates and clarifying their
record. Cruz used this most successfully to try and fix the perception
that he was pro amnesty as Fox News/Google (the debate hosts) played clips of
the candidates speaking on issues in testimony while in Congress or from
interviews. Basically it made it impossible for them to lie on stage if
they were intending to in the first place. Needless to say post-debate
interview wise Cruz being the person in second place nationally used this
interview well and Megyn Kelly even clarified that Cruz's voting record showed
he did not support amnesty, but that the clip that Fox/google showed made him
look a bit dishonest, as if he was acting out a part while giving that testimony.
Cruz struggled a little with how to answer when presented with this, but
ultimately after Megyn Kelly pushing him answered that he was using the opponent’s
words against them (the opponents being pro amnesty Democrats and Republicans).
Final Thought: The debate was overall successful
and enjoyable especially the fact checking and the video clips used by the
debate hosts. I wish I could have heard more from Rand Paul as he is my
number one candidate with Cruz and Carson being numbers two and three.
With the Iowa voters gearing up today, we are sure to have an enjoyable
news day for those like me who like Presidential horse races.
No comments:
Post a Comment